Executive Summary Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Remote Identification of Unmanned Aircraft System

Discussion in 'News' started by cabinfourus, Dec 27, 2019.

  1. cabinfourus

    cabinfourus New Member

    Mar 2, 2019
    12
    1
    3
    Male
  2. Jagerbomb52

    Jagerbomb52 Guest

    Here is the long-awaited FAA NPRM for Remote ID and an executive summary.


    https://www.federalregister.gov/doc...e-identification-of-unmanned-aircraft-systems

    Remote ID Proposal Outlaws Home-built RC Aircraft

    PATRICK MCKAY·MONDAY, DECEMBER 30, 2019·
    I want to clear up a myth about the FAA's proposed remote ID rules that I've been seeing floating around. People think that amateur home-built model aircraft will be largely unaffected by this, since they can just fly at AMA fields. Or people think that to build and fly model aircraft outside of AMA fields, all they would have to do is slap some kind of transponder on their model and they are good to go. This is completely wrong. This proposal will effectively outlaw home-built model aircraft as most people actually build them.
    The reason for this is the production standards. The proposal contains two completely different types of rules: operational rules and production rules. The operational rules allow UAS without remote ID to be flown at a FRIA site. The production standards prohibit anyone from producing a UAS that does not comply with the remote ID rules, regardless of whether it is even flown. Just building a UAS for private use that does not comply with remote ID is a violation of the law, unless one qualifies for an exemption from the production rules.
    Many people (including the AMA apparently) read that amateur-built models are exempt from the production requirements and think that means they're fine. However, the devil is in the details, which in this case is the definition of amateur-built, which "means an unmanned aircraft system the major portion of which has been fabricated and assembled by a person who undertook the construction project solely for their own education or recreation."
    The FAA's proposal clarifies that this means more than 50% of the total components in the Unmanned Aircraft System (which includes the ground control station) must be fabricated and assembled by the hobbyist. Home-built models using mostly parts that are pre-fabricated and purchased separately are expressly excluded from this exemption:
    UAS assembled completely from pre-fabricated parts. The FAA anticipates that some model aircraft enthusiasts may assemble UAS entirely from pre-fabricated parts and that commercial vendors may wish to sell UAS parts, including packages that contain more than 50 but less than 100 percent of the parts necessary to build a UAS. The resulting UAS would not qualify as amateur-built because the person building it would be fabricating and assembling 50 percent or less of the UAS. The UAS would not qualify as built from a kit because it did not include 100 percent of the necessary parts. Under these circumstances, the person assembling the UAS would be considered the producer and would be required to comply with the design and production requirements of proposed subpart F. (NPRM p. 152.)
    We’ll leave aside the fact that the proposed regulation provides no way to quantify parts. Raw number of all components down to individual chips on circuit boards? Number of black-boxed components like receivers and flight controllers? Total mass? As currently written, the amateur-built exception to the production requirements would not apply to the vast majority of modelers.
    Even assuming parts are quantified by black-boxed components, most amateur model aircraft would fall into the pre-fabricated, rather than amateur-built category, as most people assemble model aircraft from a collection of pre-fabricated parts they buy separately from various manufacturers. They might buy the airframe as a pre-cut styrofoam body (for planes) or carbon fiber sections (for quads), then glue/screw it together and mount and wire up motors, flight controllers, speed controllers, receivers, and cameras and video transmitters for FPV craft.
    The most anyone ever fabricates themselves is the aircraft body. Nobody is fabricating their own receivers, speed controllers, lithium batteries, motors, or remote controllers, so virtually no model aircraft hobbyists would actually qualify for the amateur-built exception which requires more than 50% of parts (however that is quantified) to be fabricated and assembled by the builder.
    The vast majority of RC hobbyists would fall under the category of using more than 50% prefabricated parts that do not come as a single kit with 100% of the parts necessary to fly. The proposed regulation would treat such modelers as UAS producers, and would require them to comply with all the production standards to produce and certify a UAS as RID compliant. This process is long and convoluted, and is clearly contemplated to only be used by large corporations developing mass produced UAS to be sold to consumers (the proposal estimates this process would only ever be used by a few hundred corporate entities).
    Let’s assume a hobbyist could even comply with the technical requirements to equip a model with remote ID (doubtful given the tamper-resistant requirement which would at minimum prohibit the use of open source flight controllers and could be interpreted to require the person who built the model to somehow prevent himself from bypassing the remote ID system). The certification process requires the purchase of multiple standards that could cost hundreds of dollars to even read, and the filing of extensive forms and reports with the FAA that is estimated to exceed over 50 pages and take hundreds of man hours to produce. It would be completely impossible for any individual hobbyist to comply with these procedures for their home-built model aircraft.
    Thus as written in the currently proposal, building your own home-built model aircraft the way the vast majority of hobbyists actually do that would be illegal. It doesn’t matter where you fly them, or even if you fly them at all. Merely building a UAS without equipping it with remote ID and following the process to certify it with the FAA would be an independent violation of the law. It goes without saying that this would be completely unenforceable, but that’s not the point.
    Legally at least, this proposal will completely outlaw home-built RC model aircraft as they are actually made by hobbyists. The FAA attempted to disguise this by putting in the amateur-built exemption, and then defining it in such a way as it will be impossible to actually qualify for. I fully expect the AMA to fall for this trick and act like everything is fine because of the amateur-built exemption and the FRIA sites, because they have always sucked at statutory interpretation and anticipating how regulations affecting model aircraft will actually be applied (Sec. 336 anyone?). That’s even without considering that the FRIA exemption for AMA fields is only intended to be temporary and will be phased out over time, leaving hobbyists with nowhere to fly where they are not subject to the operational remote ID requirements.
    No matter what the AMA says, this regulation will be the death of amateur home-built model aircraft, period. It doesn’t matter if it’s a quadcopter or traditional RC plane, flown by an AMA member or not. We’re all affected by this equally, and all RC hobbyists have a duty to oppose this regulation wholesale as bringing about the extinction of our hobby.
     

    Attached Files:

  3. Jagerbomb52

    Jagerbomb52 Guest

  4. Jagerbomb52

    Jagerbomb52 Guest

    The FAA’s NRPM on RID — What It
    Ain’t
     

    Attached Files:

  5. Jeff Kerry

    Jeff Kerry New Member

    Mar 27, 2017
    6
    3
    3
    Male
    So with these new rules, how does it effect us hobby flyers and how would we get the software to do this?
     
  6. Bruce

    Bruce Active Member

    Aug 25, 2016
    221
    72
    28
    Male
    So is this saying that hobby drone flyers can only fly at AMA fields, because I fly in my back yard and my neighbor's field, Usually after dinner to relax for one battery charge or about 18 minutes...it would take me about 3 hours to drive to and from the nearest AMA flying field,..turns into a very expensive 18 minute flight......I could go out and buy an ultra-lite airplane that I can ride in, and have fewer regulations and rules, than this toy drone...
     
    Thunder Chief likes this.
  7. Bruce

    Bruce Active Member

    Aug 25, 2016
    221
    72
    28
    Male
    You know RC aircraft have been around for decades without all these rules and regulations, then quad copters came out, and were easy to fly around your back yard, and we would not have all these rules and regulations now...if it wasn't for a few idiots that just could not fly safely and broke every rule for safe flying and got the attention of the FAA along with a bunch of people who are so afraid of something they do not know anything about....Every normal drone flyer knows you do not fly around airports, or emergency situations, and forest fires, but these idiots did just that, now we all have to be punished for their bad flying.....When these new rules take effect, I will have up to three years to get rid of all of my drones, because they will no longer meet the requirements of ID transmitters..That is a lot of money down the drain, and I will not be able to buy the new drones, just will not fit in the budget anymore...I take care of my Q500 4K and fly safe because I can not afford to replace it....So my drone flying will come to an end, when these rules take effect......
     
  8. Robert Fairbanks

    Robert Fairbanks New Member

    Aug 6, 2018
    13
    4
    3
    Male
    A question for the electronic engineers in this SIG; How hard would it be to design and build an external add-on, like the Luma Cube Strobe for example? It seems to me that all the telemetry information the FAA requires is being transmitted back and forth between the transmitter/controller and the UAS already? May a really smart person could find a way to grab that info and rebroadcast it to FAA regs? just askin'
     
  9. Thunder Chief

    Thunder Chief New Member

    Mar 2, 2017
    28
    4
    3
    Male
    All of that information is being transmitted from the aircraft and the controller. They just need to figure out how to decode it.
    Will I help them with it? Um, NOPE!
     

Share This Page